McCain kicks ass!

Asked at what point he believes life begins, McCain immediately said: “At the moment of conception.”“I will be a pro-life president and this presidency will have pro-life policies,” he said, after receiving thunderous applause.Obama, rather, said answering that question would be “above my pay grade.”This is a smoke grenade that I don't think even Barack HUSSIEN Obama can hide, I suppose he is too used to having his death cult with him.The candidates’ divergent approaches were also highlighted when Warren asked them both if evil does exist. McCain’s response was an immediate “yes.” He added as president “If I have to follow him to the gates of Hell, I will get Usama bin Laden.”Obama said Americans must have humility when confronting evil. “A lot of evil’s been perpetuated based on the claim that we were fighting evil.”Well, he is throwing out the "its all our fault" line again. When will we ever wake up to the fact that Al Qaeda is NOT an enemy who will listen to reason?Asked to name three wise people they would listen to, Obama named his wife, Michelle; his maternal grandmother, who lives in Hawaii; and, not limiting himself to only a third, named several Democratic and Republican lawmakers.McCain named Gen. David Petreaus, head of U.S. troops in Iraq; U.S. Rep. and veteran civil rights leader John Lewis, D-Ga.; and former eBay CEO Meg Whitman, a top adviser to his campaign.He does not understand "three" I suppose, and also, a wife who was only proud of America when HUSSIEN was nominated hangs a big question mark over his head.Well, that’s all I have to comment for this forum. Your thoughts?

Yes It's True

We spend BILLIONS of U.S. taxpayer dollars to finance the Iraqi government in their CIVIL WAR, but we won’t spend the necessary money to properly care for the troops that we send into harms way to carry out the actions and wishes of our President.I wrote a piece a while back called A matter of Inconvenient Hypocrisy, and in it I pointed out the hypocrisy that I feel is shown by so many sites that support Bush, and ANY decision he makes, sites that declare their undying love of George W. Bush and the troops, sites that declare they are 100% in support of the troops and the wars we fight. Unequivocal support.Yet in that support they never, or at most, rarely, address issues such as this. Why does it take having the MSM get involved to get anything done for the troops?A matter of Inconvenient Hypocrisy? Or blind Bush Bot devotion? Either way, I am NOT drinking that Kool Aid. You either support the troops, AND their after-action care, 100%, or you’re a hypocrite that’s waving the flag in an effort to impress a few weak minded readers